|
||||
|
||||
What's in a name? |
Andrea Polli |
Feb 22, 2004 05:51 PST |
||
| Hello; I just joined the list, and my background in collaboration/cooperation has been in 2 areas: large scale urban community-based work and art and science work. In both areas, I believe it is essential to establish a shared language. A few examples: 1. In cooporations between scientists, the shared language of mathematics can be a starting point. In art/science cooperation, sometimes terms from mathematics have different meanings in the arts. One of my ongoing collaborations has been with atmospheric scientists in the sonification (translation of data to sound) of weather data <http://www.andreapolli.com/studio/atmospherics>. During the development of the project, one of my collaborators began talking about the need to 'interpolate.' Another collaborator became alarmed by this idea, believing that he meant 'interpolate the data' that would depart from our shared desire to accurately represent the data. It turned after much spiritied debate out that the interpolation he was talking about was in sound, not data. 2. Sometimes even basic terms can become stumbling blocks. At an interdisciplinary workship that included computer and gis scientists, meteorologists, psychologists, and one artist (aside: I told one of the psychologists that I felt out of place and in true psychologist form she said 'Everyone feels out of place.' :-) For an entire day of the 3 day workshop we got stuck on the definition of a term. The term? 'event' Each discipline defined an event in vastly different ways. As we move into extended networks of cooporation, the definition of the 'event' for artists also becomes murky. Is a synchronous event the same as an asynchronous event for example? What about events that combine synchronous/asynchronous? What marks the beginning and end of a cooperation? 3. My last example is an example from urban community collaboration. In this example, I want to extend the discussion of 'language' to maps and boundaries. In one collaboration with inner-city youth in Chicago, we had to travel to various neighborhoods to create video documentation. The process became a learning experience for me as I discovered that there were boundaries between neighborhoods that were very important to the youth that I wasn't aware of. Through the project, we were able to re-define these boundaries, effectively expanding the world of the participants. I'm sure many of the participants on this list can speak to the importance of maps as a shared and evolving language in collaboration. A few years ago, I was a participant in Bridges, the International Consortium on Collaboration in Art and Technology <http://www.banffcentre.ca/bnmi/bridges/>, and one of our primary goals was to try to find a shared language between artists and scientists, and there is some information on the site this group might find useful. -- |
||||
|
||||